From unspoilt eco-tourism hub to dusty, mining town in 10 years? A perspective on mining in Mtunzini

HOW MINING WILL CHANGE MTUNZINI

The tourism brochures boast about its ‘pristine coastline’ and ‘zig-zagging rivers and streams’ in a ‘clean and safe environment’. They also mention its commitment to the ‘preservation of its natural heritage’. But if mining giant Exxaro KZN Sands gets its way, all this could be lost for future generations who may well wonder how a village like Mtunzini and its ravaged, dusty surroundings was ever known as the Jewel of the Zululand coast. Exxaro is due to start mining the 4 000-hectare Fairbreeze site in 2013 – once mining at Hillendale, near Felixton, is complete and the facilities currently being used at Hillendale are moved to a site near Highfield Country Home.

Digital artist's impression of potential damage

Digital artist’s impression of potential damage

The minerals to be mined include titanium, ilmenite and zircon, with the richest deposits found in Fairbreeze C Extension adjacent the Xaxaza Leisure Park at the end of Mimosa Street where Exxaro hopes to start mining. All Hillendale staff will transfer to Fairbreeze and no new permanent jobs will be created. Exxaro anticipates that just over 1 000 temporary jobs will be created in the construction phase – mostly when the plant is physically lifted off the Hillendale site and moved along the N2 (the bridges will be lifted to allow the plant to pass underneath) to Fairbreeze and later when the plant is enlarged.

Once Exxaro gets the go-ahead to mine, the present vegetation on the mine site will be bulldozed and burnt, exposing large areas of soil which will then be broken down by a high-powered hydraulic process requiring 48million litres of water a day running 24 hours a day.  The minerals are then extracted from this slurry and the waste pumped to two slimes dams about 5kms away on the inland side of the N2. One of the main concerns of the Mtunzini Conservancy and the Mtunzini Residents Association (MRA) who are opposing the mining is that these mega-dumps, as they are also known, are not only enormous (600 hectares in size, 5 kms long and 1,4 kms wide) but are sited on environmentally sensitive wetlands, and will never be able to be rehabilitated. These dumps will become a permanent eyesore at the entrance to Mtunzini. To understand the size of these slimes dams, you have to imagine 17 golf courses the size of Mtunzini Country Club placed side by side.

“There is no evidence in the Basic Assessment Report (BAR), or elsewhere that we know of, to support the claim by Exxaro that such slimes dams can be successfully rehabilitated to economic timber production – or any other crop,’ said a spokesperson for SOS (Save Our Sands) which represents the interests of the Conservancy and the MRA. “It appears that the slimes dams could be a threat to safety, and blot our landscape forever. A literature search indicates that 30m high dam walls are at the upper safe limit for slimes dams. The planned Fairbreeze slimes dams will be 37m high in places. “There is also no evidence to support the claim by Exxaro that the soil hydraulically shattered by the process can be ‘reconstituted’ and returned to the highly productive agriculture and forestry that is currently in place.“Exxaro claims that the existing Hillendale mine operation is supposed to provide all the answers with respect to rehabilitation of the mined area and the slimes dams and that lessons learned at Hillendale will be applied at the proposed Fairbreeze mine. “From our perspective, there is nothing to suggest that they have learned how to do anything at Hillendale. From recent visits to Hillendale, Google Earth images, and several aerial surveys there is scant evidence of successful rehabilitation work that has been completed and reported on and/or published in reputable journals.” “If Exxaro doesn’t get this right, we could be left with a wasteland,” says Jim Chedzey who leads the SOS campaign. Not only a wasteland but a town which has lost its allure and with little chance of future investment. According to the municipal valuation roll, the village of Mtunzini represents an investment of R1-billion with an annual rates base of R12-million.

In contrast, Exxaro is expected to make R1,2-billion profit annually in the 12 years that it will mine at Fairbreeze and is expected to pay uMlalazi Municipality only R1,6m in annual rates. Since King Cetshwayo’s white chief, John Dunn, discovered its charms in the 19th Century, Mtunzini has always been an attractive place to live or holiday in one of its many guest houses. Today it is just a hop off the N2 with easy access to Richards Bay, the famous game reserves of Zululand, King Shaka International Airport and Durban. It’s the kind of village where one will meet a zebra at the pedestrian crossing or a Woollynecked Stork at the stop street. It has a history of respecting its environment and sense of place. In the 1940s the local civic authority handed over large portions of the coastal forest to the Natal Parks Board as it was concerned about the high level of poaching taking place. A decade later Ian Garland moved to a neighbouring farm where he pioneered stream rehabilitation and started the first environmental education centre in South Africa. By the millennium, Mtunzini had become the first urban area to be granted conservancy status and it had received many accolades and conservation awards for its work in the clearing of alien invasive plants.

Its residents are fiercely protective of its eco-estate lifestyle and have fought many hard battles to keep it that way but the proposed mining is without a doubt its biggest challenge – taking up many voluntary hours of research, meetings, canvassing and fund-raising to cover legal fees. But for residents the stakes are high. Property owners have been offered naught for their comfort – only the fear that their life savings will drop and devalue as Mtunzini becomes a less than attractive place to live or visit. At present, there are more than 100 houses on the market.

Residents are mostly concerned about the fine dust which will blow from an open-cast mine 100 metres away, as well as the noise levels of a 24-hour a day, seven days a week operation. They are also concerned about their water supply and water quality. The mine will use more water in a day than the town uses in a month. Who can predict how this will affect this already critical resource, 10 years down the road? One of the toxic slimes dams is situated in the catchment of the Siyaya River which flows into the Umlalazi Nature Reserve, another dam falls within the catchment of the Nyezane River which flows into another protected area, the Amatikulu Nature Reserve.

Not to mention, the main drainage lines on the Fairbreeze site which flow directly into the wetlands behind the sand dunes in the Siyaya Coastal Park. The shock troops of this total onslaught on the town, are the residents of Xaxaza Leisure Park – a small community of 65 retired pensioners who will bear the worst brunt of the mining. This quiet, shady warren of narrow lanes lined with modest cabins and a popular caravan park only has a 100-metre barrier of nine-year-old trees between it and one of the dirtiest mining operations seen on the South African coast. “It’s absolutely dreadful,” says Xaxaza co-owner Merle Muller about  the prospect of mining right opposite her entrance. “I spoke to the owner of Harbour Lights [a caravan park on the Hillendale site] and he said: ‘Merle, the day they start mining you may as well close your business because no one is going to stay at your caravan park and the permanent residents certainly won’t want to live under those conditions.

“He said it was so dirty and dusty that residents had to wash everything every day if it had been left outside. We all wrote letters to Exxaro and the Minister begging them to move the mine a safe distance away from us. I posted 65 letters but it seems to have been a waste of time because we haven’t received a single reply. Not even an acknowledgement from Exxaro. And what’s it going to do to our health? We’re all pensioners here.” Also of huge concern is the future of the Twinstreams Environmental Education Centre situated just above the confluence of the Siyaya and Amanzimnyama streams. Begun 60 years ago by sugarcane farmer, the late Ian Garland, who foresaw the threat faced by the environment long before the present debate on climate change, Twinstreams is now run jointly by the Wildlife and Environment Society of South Africa (WESSA) and Mondi (the present owners of the land to be mined).

Every year, more than 4 000 school children pass through the Centre where they have the chance to explore several pristine, diverse ecosystems, study riverine rehabilitation, the impact of humans on catchments as well as enjoy fun activities such as hiking along the beach and canoeing in the estuary. Because of Ian Garland’s proud legacy, Twinstreams has always been a valuable lesson to all who pass through it that individuals can make a vital difference. But to many, having an environmental education centre on the edge of a mine is a bizarre and abhorrent mental image. In its answer to the concerns raised about the future of Twinstreams Centre, the Addendum Report noted only that Exxaro ‘should financially assist with investigating suitable alternative sites’. In his lifetime, Ian Garland estimated that he had planted over 60 000 indigenous trees – not only on his own farm but along most of the watercourses on the Fairbreeze site and wherever he felt the landscape needed a bit of ‘cheering up’.

Mtunzini’s sense of place owes much to his voluntary tree-planting, enthusiastic guidance, first-hand knowledge and foresight. At his funeral in 2007, all the tributes referred to his life’s work of creating a forest along the Siyaya as his living monument. Who knows how this monument will look in 2020 if the mining goes ahead? “Many of us learnt some valuable life lessons from Ian Garland and we saw what a lonely battle he fought most of his life to try and save the Siyaya catchment,” says longtime resident and farmer Bruce Hopwood. “It’s painful for us to be in the Fairbreeze area and ponder the future of his extraordinary legacy. He only wanted to leave the world a better place than he found it and now we’re faced with its plunder by a faceless multi-national company that only sees profits and will never know what we have lost.”

source: mtunzini.co.za

, ,

8 Responses to From unspoilt eco-tourism hub to dusty, mining town in 10 years? A perspective on mining in Mtunzini

  1. Viv January 12, 2012 at 12:26 pm #

    So sad… not even putting all that earth back would restore it.

  2. Mirya January 12, 2012 at 5:18 pm #

    it is unbelievable how we as a nation of people have become so disenfranchised to the belief that we own this land and therefore should have a stronger say in it’s uses and it’s protection.
    You know the saddest thing is that the lives of the poor just become poorer. It is ironic isn’t it that the very people we are supposed to be uplifting just keep on slipping. Now we must take away their pristine land, their natural life and existence for R1.6 mil a year. Who is being sold out all the time by their very own people!!

  3. Helen January 15, 2012 at 8:23 pm #

    This must not happen. How can you ever rehabilitate something like this. Too much water being used on a daily basis as well.

  4. kim January 25, 2012 at 1:03 pm #

    a further article on the issue – http://www.businessday.co.za/articles/Content.aspx?id=162664

  5. mol-d February 10, 2012 at 8:36 am #

    a message from exxaro via its enviro consultants, acer:

    PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION OF FAIRBREEZE MINE AND RELATED ACTIVITIES, KWAZULU-NATAL (DC28/0036/2010)
    AMENDED FINAL BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT

    In October 2011, Exigent Engineering Consultants (Environmental Assessment Practitioner) and Exxaro KZN Sands (Applicant) were requested by the KwaZulu-Natal Department of Agriculture, Environmental Affairs and Rural Development (DAEARD) to provide clarification and additional information on the Basic Assessment Report previously submitted for the above proposed development (requested in terms of Regulation 24(2) of the National Environmental Management Act, 1998 (Act 107 of 1998) (as amended) dealing with the Basic Assessment Report rejection process).

    This letter serves to inform you that an Amended Final Basic Assessment Report has been compiled for submission to DAEARD. Kindly note that all changes made have been underlined in the text of the report. These reports can be viewed at the following venues:

    q Mtunzini Public Library (1 hard copy and 5 CDs).
    q Gingindlovu Public Library (1 hard copy and 1 CD).
    q Acer Africa website (under the ‘Current Projects’). Also, the web site contains the Executive Summary of the Amended Report.

    Interested and Affected Parties are invited to comment on the documents for inclusion in an amended submission to DAEARD. Please note that the closing date for comment is 1 March 2012.

    The closing date for comment is 1 March 2012 to be submitted to:

    Dr William Mngoma
    Department of Agriculture, Environmental Affairs and Rural Development
    Environment: North Region
    Private Bag X1048, Richards Bay, 3900

    Contact: Mr Muzi Mdamba
    Telephone: 035 780 6844
    Fax: 035 789 8211
    Email: muzi.mdamba@kzndae.gov.za
    Yours sincerely,

    ACER (Africa) Environmental
    Management Consultants

  6. mol-d March 9, 2012 at 2:05 pm #

    FYI, the closing date was extended to today, 9th March. I have submitted the following:

    Dear Dr Mngoma,

    Please find below my comments/ concerns on the proposed Fairbreeze project:

    The project will not create additional jobs, aside for the short
    construction phase. Whilst the company claims that the jobs from
    Hillendale will be maintained, there seems to be no clear plan for
    ensuring employment post the Fairbreeze development. In this sense,
    the project is not going to lead to sustainable economic growth of the
    region- especially since the planned life of mine is only 11 to 13
    years.
    The report states that the project will be on land which has already
    been degraded. Whilst it is undeniable that the land has been used for
    agriculture and hence moved from its initial state, the impacts of
    mining to the deep soils, top soils and topography will be some much
    more extensive. In fact, mines in South Africa have a very back track
    record for rehabilitation, including Exxaro’s poor record of
    rehabilitation of the Hillendale site.

    The mining method will be highly water intensive and there are
    considerable risks of run off from the slime dams (not to mention the
    fact that these dumps will remain an eye sore forever).
    Tourism has been a high growth area for South Africa, with figures
    from 8 to 15% growth in the industry over the last 10 years. Whilst
    the report states that there are currently only 200 people employed in
    tourism in the region if one conservatively assumes that tourism would
    grow at a rate of 5% in terms of employment this means that over the
    life of the project (13 year baseline) 177 jobs could be created. The
    planned mine will only employ 240 people and these jobs would end
    after 13 years.
    The reports on impacts of dust from the existing Hillendale operation
    clearly show that the mine is significantly impairing the surrounding
    communities’ living environments. The fact that the proposed project
    will now be in very close proximity to households (less than 1 km
    away) will worsen the situation.

    Based on this information and further details, including the fact that
    the proposed mine will negatively affect protected and endangered
    species and that 99% of the mine product will be exported, and hence
    not directly lead to further economic growth in South Africa, I
    strongly object this project and ask the Department of Environmental
    Affairs to reject the developers’ application.

    Please keep me informed of any developments related to the proposed mine.

    Kind regards,

    Grant

    Feel free to adjust and submit as you wish…

  7. mol-d July 24, 2012 at 1:38 pm #

    looks as though it has been approve:

    http://www.fin24.com/Companies/Mining/KZN-approves-controversial-dune-mine-20120720-2

Leave a Reply

%d bloggers like this: